[I wrote this article back in 2001 and am deeply saddened to see that the Dake Bible cultists are even more lost than they were before. At first I contacted the leader personally, then I brought another brother in and the Dakite leader still did not repent, so then I wrote the article for the church to see (done perfectly in line with Matthew 18:15-17). The Dakites have attacked my forum to spread their love for their pet sins (mainly they seem to focus on divorce and remarriage, because many of the more vocal Dakite cultists are divorced and remarried or married to a divorcee, something Jesus calls adultery in Mark 10:11-12, Luke 16:18, etc.). Even the cult leader himself attacked my forum and pretended to be a truth seeker, when I called him out on his lies he pretended he was not trying to be someone else. He was embarrassed by his sin, but the cultists loved it and laughed about it and his filthy posts.
I would also add that most of the people that enjoy Dake's works or discuss him on message boards and forums dedicated to him are not cultists and do not exalt Dake in the least.]
The late Finis Jennings Dake wrote many
books, but the material he is most well known for is his reference
Bible entitled, "The Dake Annotated Reference Bible." It is basically a
compilation of Adam Clarke and E.W. Bullinger's life's works (among
others), and is fairly Scriptural. It does err in a major area when he
contradicts himself numerous times over the issue of divorce and remarriage. This has become a central issue for those who worship Dake, who I call the Dakites.
Dake's notes' position of blatant contradiction and error on repentance
being required for all sins, including that of an adulterous remarriage
is the worst. It is sad, because it takes away from the good that can
be found in Dake's materials. For example, Finis Dake taught:
[Note on Matthew 19:9]:
Seven Reasons Marriage is Indissoluble:
1. By divine institution (Mt. 19:4, 6, 8)
2. By express commandment (Mt. 19:5-6)
3. By the example of Adam and Eve (Mt. 19:8)
4. Because marriage makes a man and a woman one in flesh, with complete union of interests, fortunes, desires, joys, sorrows, and a lifelong partnership (Mt. 19:5-6)
5. Because of the evils consequent to divorce for themselves, their children, and others who become entangled in sin by it (Mt. 19:9; Mk. 7:21; Rom. 1:29-32)
6. Because of the penalties involved by causing such evils (Mt. 19:9; Gal. 5:19-21; 1Cor. 6:9-11)
7. Because there is no excuse under the gospel for "hardness of heart" against each other (2Cor. 5:17-18; Eph. 4:24; Gal. 5:24)
[Note on Galatians 5:19-21]:
No man who commits these sins [including all adultery] will ever inherit the kingdom of God unless he confesses and puts them out of his life (see 1Cor. 6:9-11, notes). Let any man claim that he can be saved and yet live in these sins and the judgment will decide whether he or Paul is right.
Now you would get the impression from
reading these notes that all sin must not only be confessed, but must
also be put out of one's life if they are saved. Well, in other notes
Dake contradicts this on the sole issue of adulterous remarriages. It
seems this is the one single sin that according to him all one has to
do is confess it as sin, but they do not have to put it out of their
lives. Dake does not go in much detail about this, but he put enough
doubt and misleading for anyone to see false repentance as an option
when it comes to this form of adultery.
[Note on Matthew 19:9]
Any man who divorces his wife for any cause except fornication commits adultery if he marries another. Any man marrying her that is divorced for her own fornication commits adultery. This was evidently an unpleasant answer to these scheming men who wished to be free to put away their wives for "every cause."
What does the verse he is commenting on actually say? "Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be
for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and
whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery." Firstly, he
perverts the obvious distinction between fornication (relations before
marriage between two unmarried people) and adultery (relations between
a married person and another person). Then he adds words to the
Scripture by saying that Jesus meant a woman that was put away for her
own fornication, when Jesus said, "her which is put away," not qualify
it as being a specific divorcee. Clearly Dake contradicts himself and
blatantly opposes the plain teaching of the Bible for one that allows
for sin.
Dake also teaches the absurd in his attempt to excuse divorce and
remarriage when he comments on 1 Corinthians 7:15 which reads, "But if
the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not
under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace."
[Note 1 Corinthians 7:15]
Here we have another legal and scriptural reason for divorce and remarriage. If the unbeliever refuses to live with a wife or husband because of Christianity and if he or she is determined to leave on this account, the Christian is not under further marriage bonds and is not held responsible or punished by requirement to remain single the rest of his or her life because of the rebellion of another. The Christian is to submit to the breaking of the marriage covenant under such circumstances.
All 1 Corinthians 7:15 tells us is that
if the unbelieving spouse departs, a believer is to let them depart.
Why? Because God has called them to peace. They are not under bondage
in such cases. It says nothing about remarriage. A lot of remarried
people say that because it says, "A brother or a sister is not under
bondage in such cases," that it means they are free to remarry.
Well, that contradicts Paul's teaching just a few verses above in 1
Corinthians 7:10-11, which only allows for remaining single or
reconciling in the case of departure. The very case Paul is
talking about in 1 Corinthians 7:15. Whether it is you departing or
your unbelieving spouse departing, you have only two options, to stay
unmarried (that means do not get remarried) or be reconciled. This is plain, and
only one looking to excuse the sin of remarriage could see it any other
way.
When Paul is talking to unmarried people, some already espoused to a
wife, and some loosed from their espoused wives (1 Corinthians
7:25-28), Dake, of course, changes who is being talked to and warps the
entire meaning. Paul plainly says "Now concerning virgins," and that is
the group he is addressing, not the already married, so obviously verse
27 and 28 still refer to the virgins, because Paul only starts
addressing another group in verse 29. Let's see what Dake says about 1
Corinthians 7:27:
This means divorced from a wife or husband on legal and scriptural grounds. Because of the "present distress" of that day the advice was: "seek not a wife"; but if you do marry you have not sinned
If he taught Biblically on this issue,
then maybe we could assume that he was referring to those espoused
also, but when one looks at the rest of Dake's notes it becomes clear
that the agenda is to push divorce and remarriage as good options and
not attach any weight of wrong to them. Once again he pushes his
divorce and remarriage myth. It is even more sad, when you realize that
Dake taught "Death breaks all marriage bonds" (Note on Romans 7:2), and
yet dreamed up all manner of other things he thinks break the marriage
bond. Mainly he sees a divorce decree, given for whatever reason, even
others than the ones he make up, will end the marriage bond, that God
Himself says only death ends (Romans 7:2-3; 1 Corinthians 7:39), and
Dake even says this in his radio teachings.
Truly when divorce and remarriage is excused or even claimed to be
blessed of God, there Satan must needs be president of that church. I
think this can be found to be no difference.
Dake teaches that when it comes to a sodomite, they must repent and
discontinue all sin (which is true). He also teaches that when it comes
to an adulterer or adulteress who is remarried, all they have to do is
confess their sin. He then reasons that the mere confession of this sin
makes their adulterous remarriage no longer adulterous and makes God
look the other way at it. Essentially, the whole idea is that the
adulterer (that is one by means of entering into an adulterous
relationship) does not have to get the sin out of their lives like
every other sinner. This select group of sinners can sin with impunity,
and are encouraged to do so by Dake's notes excusing this sin.
It is impossible to know what he would have said to these people who idolize him and quote his word as the word of God, and whose lives center around the main
area he was wrong in, but it is safe to say that this error alone was
fatal and has damned numerous people to hell. It is worse yet, because
many pastors preach Dake's notes like they were their own, without
thinking for themselves. Thus, Dake's influence of false repentance and
easy-believism in the area of divorce and remarriage
continues even to this very date many years after his death. The main
aspect that seems to drive a lot of the followers of Dake is the love
of divorce and remarriage
and the hatred of anyone that dares to expose the hypocrisy in the
teaching of Dake (claiming that adulterers and adulteresses do not have
to repent of their sin to be forgiven, but that everyone else does).
Here are some of the things the Lord said about such a sin:
Matthew 5:31-32
31 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:
32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Matthew 19:9
9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.
Luke 16:18
18 Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.
Now it is abundantly clear that "whoso marrieth her which is put away
doth commit adultery" because marriage is only ended by the death of
the spouse, not divorce, abandonment, or anything else (Romans 7:2-3; 1
Corinthians 7:39), regardless of the claims of Dake.
Having pointed the Scriptures out to the Dakites myself, I can tell you
that their main argument is based on how they feel and their emotions.
If it is not that, then they go back to quoting some of Finis Dake's
notes. Speaking of Finis Dake's notes, the reason they quote them and
hold them in such high regard (as God's own words, they say), can be
seen in the following quote taken from one of the lesser members of
their cult:
The Dake material is all you need, because it's all God's word. That's what He Vowed to teach the word of God . Why spent a life time looking for truth when we already have it in the Dake's Bible?Yes, they claim that the late Finis Dake's materials are "all God's word!!!!" As blasphemous as this is, they actually teach this and this is why they quote Dake as if they were quoting the Bible. I might add that Dake never comes close to making any such claim for his materials, for he even told others numerous times to not even believe him if he did not give you the plain teaching of the Scriptures! That would include his false and damnable heresy on divorce and remarriage, but they do not seem to want to listen to even Dake when it comes to that.
Monday, 01-Jan-01 13:40:20
205.188.198.31 writes:
-----------------
Just Five Points OF ContrastThese people hold the Dake Bible up as the word of God. They have unwavering faith in Finis Dake, even though he was a known criminal who broke the Mann Act. According to the 2000 Columbia Encyclopedia: Sixth Edition, the Mann act is as the following description shows.
Thursday, 01-Feb-01 08:06:55
Message: 193.78.199.94 writes:
Orthodoxy and also many Charismatics, Pentecostals and Evangelicals reject the following doctrines and by doing so the Dake Bible: [then went on to list 5 doctrines]
In the United States, where prostitution was widespread, it was thought to be closely connected with other crimes. No major effort to stamp out prostitution appeared until about the end of the 19th cent. In 1910 the Mann Act, or White Slave Traffic Act, was passed through the efforts of James Robert Mann; it forbade under severe penalty the interstate and international transportation of women for immoral purposes.Finis Dake plead guilty to this, and I cannot imagine an innocent man pleading guilty to such a vile crime, in his case, with a young child. According to one Dakite cultist, Dake was set up by the Catholic church, but even if that is so, he did not have to plead guilty. Only the guilty would plead guilty, otherwise they would be lying, and who would lie about committing such a sickening crime?
There are certain sufferings that are needless for any Christian to go through in any land at any time. A Christian does not have to live in sin and suffer for his own wrongdoings at any time or place. If he does live in sin he is no longer a Christian.... [Emphasis his]
He makes
it plain that any person living in sin is no longer a Christian, and
yet he allows for divorced and remarried adulterers and adulteresses to
be Christian when they live in the sin of adultery among other sins!
Such hypocrisy warps the entire gospel, and makes for the unrepentant
and devil possessed to actually believe they are children of God when
the Scripture says otherwise (1 John 3:8-10)!
On Matthew 19:6 Dake notes:
Many today claim that all married people are not joined together by God, so they are free to marry the one God intended them to have. The fact is that God recognizes all legal marriages and will hold people responsible for their vows (Rom. 13:1-10).
Yet, he
says that God does not hold people accountable for their vows if they
get a divorce. On a tape in the late 50's Dake said that you could get
divorced and remarried 50 times or infinitey as long as you got the
proper bill of divorce, the marriage was as good as gone. So how can
anyone take their marriage vows seriously if, according to Dake, a
piece of paper destroys them?
In Romans 6:2 Dake has a note called, "Twenty Reasons For Not Living In Sin"
So we see numerous and great reasons for not living in sin, and yet Dake taught people to stay in a sin that permeates numerous lives. As many as a third or more of Americans are remarried or married to a divorcee! And if they read Dake's writings they get no rebuke for this sin. They may go through an entire life of reading Dake's notes and never come to the truth! The greater tragedy is that with so much of Dake's material actually being good, many people just assume Dake was right because he gave a lot of references, even though if they actually read the references they would see that on the issue of adultery, he was dead wrong! On this issue he has lead who knows how many people into hell through notes, books, and tapes propagating divorce and remarriage.1. Death to sin nullifies it (Rom. 6:2-3).
2. Resurrection from spiritual death (Rom. 6:4-5).
3. We walk in newness of life (Rom. 6:4).
4. Death to sin and resurrection from sin mean walking like Christ (Rom. 6:5; 1Pet. 2:21-22; 1Jn. 2:6; 1Jn. 4:6, 17).
5. The old man is crucified and dead (Rom. 6:6; Eph. 4:22-24; 1Jn. 5:18).
6. The body of sin is destroyed, that henceforth we should not sin (Rom. 6:6).
7. We are freed from sin (Rom. 6:7, 18, 22).
8. Faith counts sin dead (Rom. 6:8).
9. Sin has no dominion over us (Rom. 6:9).
10. Sin not to reign in the body (Rom. 6:12).
11. The body must not yield to sin (Rom. 6:13).
12. Married to Christ, not sin (Rom. 7:4).
13. We walk in the Spirit (Rom. 8:1-4).
14. We are made free from the law of sin (Rom. 8:2).
15. We are spiritually minded (Rom. 8:6).
16. Christ is in us, not sin (Rom. 8:10).
17. We are not debtors to sin (Rom. 8:12).
18. Spirit mortifies sin in us (Rom. 8:13).
19. We have Spirit of freedom (Rom. 8:15).
20. Intercession of Christ and the Holy Spirit keeps us (Rom. 8:26-27, 34).